BRUSSELS (AP)– At its start, America’s war in Afghanistan was about retribution for 9/11. Then it was about supporting a weak government and its weak army so that Osama bin Laden’s al-Qaida might never again threaten the United States.

Now it’s about over. With bin Laden long because dead and the United States not suffering another major attack, President Joe Biden is assuring to end America’s longest war and proceed to what he believes are larger, more consequential difficulties posed by a resurgent Russia and a rising China.Even so, by withdrawing the remaining few thousand U.S. soldiers in Afghanistan by the 20th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks, Biden is taking a calculated danger that extremists in Afghanistan can be countered by U.S. and partner forces somewhere else in the area– and that he will not end up being the president who ignored the resilience and reach of extremists who still intend to attack the United States.CIA Director William Burns informed Congress on Wednesday the U.S. unavoidably will lose some intelligence take advantage of against the extremist hazard, although he suggested the losses would be workable.”The U.S. federal government’s capability to collect and act on threats will reduce.

That’s simply a reality,” Burns said. “It is likewise a fact, nevertheless, that after withdrawal, whenever that time comes, the CIA and all of our partners in the U.S. federal government will keep a suite of capabilities, a few of it remaining in location, some of them that we will generate, that can assist us to prepare for and contest any restoring effort.”There were 2,500 to 3,000 U.S. troops in

Afghanistan when Biden took workplace, the smallest number given that early in the war. The number peaked at 100,000 throughout President Barack Obama’s first term. As U.S. war casualties have actually decreased, so has the American public’s attention. The war was barely pointed out throughout in 2015’s governmental contest, and ending may prove politically popular.Yet worries remain. Stephen Biddle, a Columbia University professor who has actually recommended U.S. leaders

in Afghanistan, states it’s possible al-Qaida might re-establish its base structure in Afghanistan once the Americans and their coalition partners leave. The Taliban in Afghanistan promised in a February 2020 arrangement with the Trump administration that they would not permit al-Qaida or other extremist groups to utilize Afghan area to threaten the United States. However that offer may be threatened by Biden’s decision not to complete the withdrawal of forces by May 1, as the Trump administration had promised.The bigger danger, Biddle stated in an email exchange, is that the withdrawal might cause the collapse of Afghan security forces and

multi-sided civil warfare including Taliban factions and others” in a more-lethal variation of the civil war of the 1990s. “”This would be a humanitarian disaster for Afghans– far worse than today’s insurgency,”he stated. More broadly, the lack of U.S. forces in Afghanistan could cause further instability in an area with 2 competing nuclear powers– Pakistan and

India, which have insurgencies of their own to compete with.”This is already an unsafe part of the world; making it even worse by enabling the collapse of the Afghan federal government is the greatest risk here,”Biddle said.At a previously turning point in the war, Obama took a similar view. When he announced a surge of 30,000 U.S. soldiers to Afghanistan in December 2009, he refuted attempting to consist of extremist threats in the Afghanistan-Pakistan region only with what the U.S. military calls”over-the-horizon”forces– troops and aircraft placed beyond Afghan borders. “To desert this area now– and to rely just on efforts versus al-Qaida from a distance– would significantly hinder our capability to keep the pressure on al-Qaida and produce an inappropriate danger of additional attacks on our homeland and our allies,”Obama stated. So Obama went on with a troop accumulation targeted at striking the Taliban so hard that they would accept work out a peace deal. It didn’t work. The Taliban kept combating. Even after President Donald Trump licensed a more muscular

military approach to the Taliban in 2017, the hard-hit militant group did not quit. It consented to work out with the Afghan federal government, but those talks have stalled.It’s hard to judge what has actually been gotten in the 12 years considering that Obama escalated the war. Afghan security forces likely are stronger, although their durability will be tested in the absence of U.S. assistance they grew to trust. The Afghan government has actually not strengthened its authority throughout the country, and the Pentagon argues that its extreme focus on countering insurgents there and in the Middle East has actually been such a drain on resources that the U.S. is losing ground versus China and Russia.The war has actually cost more than 2,300 U.S. lives and countless suffering amongst Afghans given that the United States got into in October 2001. Ten years into the war, in May 2011, U.S. forces killed bin Laden in Pakistan, and for a short time it seemed possible that Washington would see an opening for ending the war.A few weeks after bin Laden’s death, a young American soldier at a dirty station in eastern Afghanistan asked visiting Defense Secretary Robert Gates what impact the al-Qaida leader’s demise would have on the war, recommending hope that it would accelerate its end and allow troops to go home.”It is prematurely to inform,” Gates replied.Ten years later, Biden has chosen

the time has actually come, although for Afghans the war might be far from over. ___ EDITOR’S KEEP IN MIND– Robert Burns has reported on the war in Afghanistan since the 2001 U.S. intrusion and has covered national security concerns from Washington considering that 1990. ___ Associated Press writer Eric Tucker contributed to this report.